Ex-Clinton ‘fixer’ exposes liberal modes of operation
Democrats blame others first for the exact criminal behavior they are doing
When the New York Times goes after someone in their editorials, it’s a good bet they are attempting to protect a liberal from truth being used against them. So is the case of Larry Nichols. In 1997 The Times deemed him as one of their “Clinton Crazies,” a term for people they wanted to muzzle because of their focus on Bill and Hillary Clinton scandals and controversies.
But in the case of Nichols, a “fixer,” political confidant and adviser to a once Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton for ten years, the New York Times was proven wrong repeatedly. Nichols was eventually proven right as he fought the liberal media while exposing the Monica Lewinsky, Jennifer Flowers, Paula Jones, Whitewater, Mena Airport and other scandals. The mainstream media was wrong. Nichols was right.
Nichols said that one of the key modes of operation of the Clintons now used in the Democratic playbook by James Comey, Loretta Lynch, Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi and so many more, is to blame others first for the exact criminal behavior they are doing. The New York Times and mainstream media continue to support that cause in their reporting.
In the case of the now famous airport tarmac meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch, Nichols commented, “I wasn’t there, but I wrote the book that they use, and I did it so many times that I know the M.O. The strange meetings, the quick meetings, the ‘accidental-on-purpose’ meeting. Bill Clinton wasn’t in Atlanta to play golf; he was there to deliver a message.”
Nichols stated the Clintons wanted her protections and for “Loretta Lynch to prosecute some of the protesters against Hillary.”
“Bill Clinton told her that he wanted her to step up and indict somebody…”
“Bill Clinton told her that he wanted her to step up and indict somebody for hate speech because that will clear the road for the rest of the way for Hillary,” Nichols surmised. “It’ll back down the conservative people that they figure is going to raise their voices.”
For being branded such a “Crazy” by the media, it turns out Nichols continues to be right. Retired FBI agents are confirming these and other such truths. Jeff Danik, a 30-year FBI veteran supervisor and Cesar Paz, a 22-year FBI terrorism and crime fighter are exposing the Democrats. They both agree James Comey tarnished the reputation of the FBI and many in the organization were suspicious of him.
Paz asked on the “memo” which Comey admitted that he gave to a Columbia University professor friend to leak out to the media “Where is the memo? Who has the memo?” If an agent were to do that, the agent would be in trouble. “That memo belongs to the government.”
Paz said, “Comey admitted, under oath, that he took an action to materially affect an investigation – that is an obstruction of justice.”
Agent Paz wants Comey to answer these questions:
Isn’t it true that you were an assistant U.S. attorney for a prosecutor between 1996 and 2003?
Isn’t it true that between 2003 and 2005, you held a position with the office of the Attorney General?
Isn’t it true that in 2005, you resigned from the Department of Justice and accepted a job as the senior vice-president with the office of general counsel at Lockheed Martin, a company that is a major, major military contractor?
Isn’t it true that in 2010, when you were employed with Lockheed Martin, Lockheed won 17 approvals for private contracts with the Department of State while Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State?
“…while you were employed with Lockheed Martin, Lockheed became a major contributor to the Clinton Foundation and non-profit organizations?”
Isn’t it true that in 2010, while you were employed with Lockheed Martin, Lockheed became a major contributor to the Clinton Foundation and non-profit organizations?
Isn’t it true that in late 2010, after Lockheed was awarded those contracts by the Hillary Clinton State Department, you stepped down from Lockheed and received a $6 million payout for your services?
Isn’t it true that in 2013, the largest bank of England, HSBC, was being investigated by federal authorities for laundering billions of dollars for the Mexican drug cartels, channeling money to the Middle East, specifically Iran, which is in violation of law?
Isn’t it true that Robert Mueller, former director of the FBI and now the special counsel to investigate the alleged “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia… isn’t it true that Mr. Mueller was the chief counsel at HSBC… the same bank that was laundering money for the cartels?
Isn’t it true that HSBC was a significant Clinton Foundation contributor? That Bill Clinton was being paid about $200,000 for his speeches at HSBC events… and this is while Mrs. Clinton was the Secretary of State? No conflict of interest there?
Isn’t it true that HSBC was basically let off the hook with a $1.2 billion fine – which was paid by shareholders – and none of its officers, managers, directors were charged criminally or let go? Isn’t it true that while all hell was breaking loose at HSBC, YOU, Mr. Comey, were appointed as a director and member of the board at HSBC to assist with damage control?
Isn’t it true, Mr. Comey, that your salary went from $206,000 in 2002 when you were a government employee, to $33.5 million in 2012…. And that you earned these moneys while working for entities that were major contributors to the Clintons?
Isn’t it true that you worked for Bridgewater Associates between 2010 and 2013, and that they are also a major contributor to the Clintons?
“…you gave this memo to Daniel Richman, your friend, a liberal professor, and he gave this memo to the New York Times?”
Isn’t it true that you worked for Columbia University in 2013 as a senior research scholar at the school of law, and that Columbia University is also a major contributor to the Clintons?
Isn’t it true that you gave this memo that you wrote on Bureau time on a classified computer in a Bureau car… and you gave this memo to Daniel Richman, your friend, a liberal professor (at Columbia), and he gave this memo to the New York Times?
Mr. Comey, you were appointed FBI Director by former President Obama in 2013, as Secretary Clinton was leaving the State Department. Isn’t it true that you were appointed by Obama as FBI Director because you had proven yourself to be of service to the Clintons and their associates and entities that contribute millions of dollars to the Clintons’ non-profit organizations?
Isn’t it true that you, as Director of the FBI in 2013 did absolutely nothing in regards to the missing $2 billion from the State Department finances, and this happened while Mrs. Clinton was Secretary of State?
Isn’t it true, that while you were Director of the FBI, for over two years, nothing happened as a result of the FBI “investigations” into the Clinton non-profit organizations?